AI Relay CheckIndependent AI API relay reviews
INDEPENDENT TEST REPORT · SEPTEMBER 2026

September 2026 Paid API Test Report

Model-specific paid API samples, success counts, median end-to-end latency, and provider-published input and output rates for six AI relays.

Scope

This rolling September report separates Claude Opus 5 from GPT-5.6 Sol. A reachable website is not an API test; different models and route types are not blended into a site-wide score.

September evidence snapshot

Paid test providers
6
Successful / total records
177 / 243
Exact model IDs / protocols
8 / 4
Latest recorded request
2026-09-29

These are rolling records from dedicated test accounts, not a uniform random availability sample. Each benchmark row represents one recorded run; a completed ten-request session is identified separately below.

ProviderSuccessful / totalExact models Observed protocolsRecorded input / output tokensLatest record
UU API 27 / 386Responses / Anthropic 43,210 / 160 2026-09-29
H API 28 / 367ClaudeCode / Responses 8,824 / 478 2026-09-29
boxying 27 / 606OpenAI / ClaudeCode 85,762 / 224 2026-09-29
LinksAPI 29 / 356Responses / Anthropic 47,168 / 191 2026-09-29
OpenOx 27 / 346OpenAI 86,611 / 188 2026-09-29
APINebula 39 / 404ClaudeCode / OpenAI 5,036 / 365 2026-09-29

Token totals are the fields returned by recorded runs and may include cache-read tokens. They are shown as evidence volume, not as a reconstructed bill or cross-provider efficiency ranking.

Latest recorded failures

ProviderModel / protocolDateHTTPRecorded error
APINebula claude-opus-5ClaudeCode 2026-09-29-timeout
OpenOx claude-fable-5-1OpenAI 2026-09-29503http_503
H API gpt-5.6-terraResponses 2026-09-29404http_404
UU API claude-opus-5Anthropic 2026-09-25400http_400
OpenOx claude-fable-5-1OpenAI 2026-09-23503http_503
H API gpt-5.5Responses 2026-09-23404http_404
LinksAPI claude-fable-5Anthropic 2026-09-22-timeout
UU API gpt-5.6-terraResponses 2026-09-22404http_404
H API gpt-5.6-terraResponses 2026-09-22404http_404
boxying claude-fable-5ClaudeCode 2026-09-20400http_400
boxying claude-sonnet-5ClaudeCode 2026-09-20400http_400
boxying claude-opus-5ClaudeCode 2026-09-20400http_400

A failure applies only to the exact model, protocol, key and time shown. It does not mean the provider's website or every model was unavailable.

Completed ten-request sessions

ProviderModel / protocolPassed roundsInput / output tokensCache-read tokensObserved account meterDate
UU API gpt-6-astraResponses 10 / 10 42,508 / 70 40,192Unavailable 2026-09-27
APINebula gpt-6-astraOpenAI 10 / 10 1,368 / 107 0¥0.0057 2026-09-19
APINebula claude-fable-5-1ClaudeCode 10 / 10 2,488 / 76 0¥0.04876 2026-09-19
OpenOx gpt-6-astraOpenAI 10 / 10 42,508 / 70 40,320Unavailable 2026-09-19
LinksAPI gpt-6-astraResponses 10 / 10 42,732 / 79 39,808$0.058064 2026-09-18
boxying gpt-6-astraOpenAI 10 / 10 42,508 / 70 40,064¥0.022604 2026-09-18
H API claude-fable-5-1ClaudeCode 10 / 10 2,928 / 121 0Unavailable 2026-09-18

The current evidence set contains 7 completed sessions. An unavailable meter is not treated as zero charge. Same-route price reconciliation remains in the dedicated billing report.

Claude Opus 5 · API samples and published premium rates

28 requests across six test accounts: 28 scheduled, 0 manual, 0 other. These are not uniform random samples.

ProviderSuccessful / total P50 totalPublished price group Input / 1MOutput / 1M Price source
UU API 1 / 3 3.61 s CC full-capability MAX - CC client only ¥6.8 ¥34 2026-09-25
H API 3 / 3 6.72 s Claude Max ¥6.4 ¥32 2026-09-25
boxying 2 / 11 2.66 s Claude official route ¥8 ¥40 2026-09-25
LinksAPI 4 / 4 3.48 s Dedicated CC Max ¥3.4 ¥17 2026-09-25
OpenOx 3 / 3 3.81 s direct ¥19.2 ¥96 2026-09-24
APINebula 3 / 4 2.73 s Claude Code global protected route ¥6.8 ¥34 2026-09-25

The published input-price range spans 5.6x across provider-labeled premium groups. The test log does not reliably identify the key's upstream group, so these request outcomes cannot be attributed to the displayed price group. A completed request does not prove model identity.

GPT-5.6 Sol · API samples and published premium rates

16 requests across six test accounts: 16 scheduled, 0 manual, 0 other. These are not uniform random samples.

ProviderSuccessful / total P50 totalPublished price group Input / 1MOutput / 1M Price source
UU API 3 / 3 1.83 s Codex-GPT Pro account pool ¥2 ¥12 2026-09-25
H API 3 / 3 3.14 s GPT Pro ¥1.5 ¥9 2026-09-25
boxying 3 / 3 10.8 s Codex premium pool ¥2.2 ¥13.2 2026-09-25
LinksAPI 3 / 3 17.0 s GPT Pro (Codex included), 0.3x ¥3.25 ¥26 2026-09-25
OpenOx 4 / 4 2.73 s Pro direct route ¥9 ¥54 2026-09-24
APINebula No sample - CODEX ¥1.95 ¥11.7 2026-09-25

The published input-price range spans 6.0x across provider-labeled premium groups. The test log does not reliably identify the key's upstream group, so these request outcomes cannot be attributed to the displayed price group. A completed request does not prove model identity.

Three findings from our own records

Coverage is model-specific. A provider with no GPT-5.6 Sol sample above cannot be described as GPT-verified for that model. The site-wide count of passing models is not a substitute for this row.

A reachable homepage and a completed API request answer different questions. The request table includes failures; website availability is tracked separately and is not used to fill missing model samples.

Rates are input and output prices for provider-selected premium groups, not observed wallet charges. Subscription full-use equivalents, cache discounts and promotional credit are excluded because plans and actual credit burn have not been reconciled across all six providers.

Method and limitations

Window: September 1–30, 2026 (China time), updated as new records arrive. Each row counts all recorded requests for that exact model, including manual and scheduled runs. P50 is the median end-to-end response time of successful requests; it is not time to first token. Samples differ by provider and time of day, and test-key groups are not fully recorded. This is an evidence ledger, not a controlled winner ranking.

Raw model-level logs are accessible from each provider profile and its evidence endpoint. We have not completed model-identity, cache, and before/after balance reconciliation for every route. Affiliate links and test credit, where present, are disclosed on provider pages; corrections: airelaycheck@163.com

Download privacy-reviewed request results (CSV) · Dated evidence changes (CSV) · Provider summary (JSON)

Answer summary

Latest test date
Providers covered
6
Models / protocols
claude-fable-5 / claude-fable-5-1 / claude-opus-5 +5 more · Anthropic / ClaudeCode / OpenAI +1 more
Successful / total samples
177 / 243
Price / billing verified
6/6 price · 6/6 billing
Still unverified
Model identity, every route, future uptime and unmatched billing
One-sentence conclusion
This is a dated evidence ledger with uneven sample timing, so use it to inspect claims rather than as a controlled winner ranking.

Related pages