AI Relay CheckIndependent AI API relay reviews
INDEPENDENT API REVIEW

boxying AI Relay Review

Review boxying website uptime, official GPT and Claude pricing, API verification evidence, current offers, and clearly labeled risk notes.

API verification

AI Relay Check records model-level requests for boxying and keeps failed samples. A successful request proves only that specific model and route at that time.

Pricing and billing

Official input and output rates are displayed separately. Published prices do not become verified billing costs until token usage and account balance changes are reconciled.

Decision boundary

API availability does not by itself prove model identity, long-term reliability, refund support, or balance safety. Start with a small test balance.

Independent paid test snapshot

Tested by
AI Relay Check review team
Last retest
2026-09-29
Protocols
ClaudeCode / OpenAI
Request success
45.0% (27/60)
First byte P50 / P95
2.40 s / 18.0 s
Total response P50 / P95
3.17 s / 18.3 s
7-day website reachability
100.0% (17)
Sample window
2026-09-18 - 2026-09-29

Models tested

claude-fable-5 · claude-opus-5 · claude-sonnet-5 · gpt-5.6-sol · gpt-5.6-terra · gpt-6-astra

Model-level request results

ModelSuccessful / totalP50 totalLatest sample
claude-fable-52 / 153.37 s2026-09-29
claude-opus-52 / 112.66 s2026-09-25
claude-sonnet-52 / 131.76 s2026-09-27
gpt-5.6-sol3 / 310.8 s2026-09-25
gpt-5.6-terra3 / 33.17 s2026-09-27
gpt-6-astra15 / 152.18 s2026-09-29

A configured model without a sample is not verified. Results combine recorded requests for this model across test keys; the exact upstream group is not consistently recorded. P50 uses successful end-to-end responses only.

Provider-published model pricing

ModelRoute typeInput / 1M tokensOutput / 1M tokensCaptured
claude-fable-5Premium / official route¥20¥1002026-09-25
claude-opus-5Economy / unofficial route¥1.5¥7.52026-09-25
claude-opus-5Premium / official route¥10¥502026-09-25
claude-sonnet-5Economy / unofficial route¥0.6¥32026-09-25
claude-sonnet-5Premium / official route¥4¥202026-09-25
gpt-5.6-solEconomy / unofficial route¥1.2¥7.22026-09-25
gpt-5.6-solPremium / official route¥2.2¥13.22026-09-25
gpt-5.6-terraEconomy / unofficial route¥0.6¥3.62026-09-25
gpt-5.6-terraPremium / official route¥1.1¥6.62026-09-25
gpt-6-astraEconomy / unofficial route¥3¥152026-09-25
gpt-6-astraPremium / official route¥5.5¥27.52026-09-25

Official published price · 2026-09-25 · Price source

Billing evidence

1 privacy-reviewed ten-request session(s) are matched to the tested-key group, token totals and account ledger. These results apply only to the listed route and date.

Model / tested-key groupSession dateObserved ten-call chargeRate calculationDifferenceRate evidence
gpt-6-astracodex_pro pool, 0.4x2026-09-18¥0.027206¥0.027202¥0.000004Historical group and multiplierThe historical log shows the standard rate, tested-key group and 0.4x multiplier; the calculation differs only by displayed rounding.

Review all account-meter sessions and remaining billing gaps · Review failure and retest timeline

What the evidence means

Strengths

Separate GPT and Claude credentials are tested, and failed requests remain visible alongside latency samples.

Limitations

The GPT-6 Astra codex_pro 0.4x ten-call ledger is reconciled, but its historical group and multiplier cannot be extended to other routes.

Best suited for

Users willing to start small and compare economy routes with premium routes before committing funds.

Still unverified

Same-request pricing and billing for other routes, model identity, longer price history and support-response evidence.

Who, how and commercial disclosure

Website probes, provider-published prices and paid model calls are stored as separate evidence types. Failed calls remain in the sample.

API request costs are paid from AI Relay Check test accounts. Account credit can include our recharge and provider promotional credit; those sources are not yet separated in every record.

This provider has a dedicated registration offer or partner entry. AI Relay Check may receive referral benefits; commercial relationships do not change samples or ranking weights.

Corrections and appeals: airelaycheck@163.com · Open raw evidence JSON

Answer summary

Latest test date
Provider covered
boxying
Models / protocols
claude-fable-5 / claude-opus-5 / claude-sonnet-5 +3 more · ClaudeCode / OpenAI
Successful / total samples
27 / 60
Price / billing verified
price yes · billing yes
Still unverified
Same-request pricing and billing for other routes, model identity, longer price history and support-response evidence.
One-sentence conclusion
boxying has 27/60 successful recorded requests; use the exact model, protocol, route and billing evidence rather than this aggregate alone.

Related pages